Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170094 (ALL)

SMT. SHANTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY U.P. GOVT. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/10986/2024 · 2025-01-02

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:95-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10986 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Shanti Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy U.P. Govt. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bare Lal Bhartiya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Petitioner's counsel is not available. Petitioner seeks payment in pursuance to the award dated 09.09.2023 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat Janopyogi Sewaye, Raibeareli in P.L.A. Case No. 11 of 2023;Smt. Shanti Vs. Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Nigam and Anr. Learned counsel for the Electricity Corporation Shri Karan Agarwal holding brief of Ms. Aprajita Bansal says that the aforesaid award has been challenged by means of writ petition bearing Writ -C No. 4401 of 2024 wherein notices have been issued. Be that as it may, the award of the Permment Lok Adalat is to be treated as a Decree under Section 22(e)(2) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 and it can be executed by the Civil Court on transmission by the Permanent Lok Adalat itself under Sub-section 5 of Section 22(a), therefore, the remedy is not a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty aforesaid. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 2.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench