AYUSH PRAJAPATI THRU. FATHER/NATURAL GUARDIAN BRIJESH KUMAR PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. SECY. HOME SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
HABC/384/2024 · 2025-07-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38210 Court No. - 13 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 384 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ayush Prajapati Thru. Father/Natural Guardian Brijesh Kumar Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranveer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ramesh Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Vishal Tripathi, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ranveer Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing Opposite parties to produce the detenue petitioner before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty at an earliest, in the interest of justice." Upon due consideration of the facts as indicated including the fact that proceedings in terms of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 instituted by the petitioner is pending as Case No. 28 of 2024 (Brijesh Kumar Prajapati Versus Ram Bachan Prajapati and Others) pending before Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambedkar Nagar, on being confronted, the learned Counsel for the petitioner says that justice would suffice, if the present petition is disposed of finally with certain observations by this Court with regard to expeditious disposal of the pending case, detailed above. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed. Considering the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is
disposed of with direction to the concerned court, to decide the case in issue, expeditiously, as it relates to the custody of a minor child. With the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench