Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17003 (JHR)

RAJAN RAJWAR ALIAS RAJEN RAJEAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1355/2025 · 2025-07-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:20589 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1355 of 2025 ------ 1. Rajan Rajwar @ Rajen Rajear, aged about 52 years, S/o Yugal Rajwar, 2. Anil Gope, aged about 29 years, S/o Madan Gope, 3. Thakur Das Gope, aged about 59 years, S/o Bhadari Gope, 4. Jiwan Gope, aged about 54 years, S/o Moti Gope, 5. Ravi Gope, aged 54 years, S/o Sudan Gope; 6. Amar Chkrarwarti @ Amarendra Nath, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Mahendra Nath Chakrawarti, All are R/o village- Kalapathar, P.O.- Chiksiya, P.S.- Chas (M), Dist.- Bokaro 7. Santosh Gope, S/o Kalpu Gope, aged about 40 years, R/o village- Alagdiha, P.O.- Chiksiya, P.S.- Chas (M), Dist.- Bokaro … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-25-07-2025 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for modification of the order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that vide order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025, the petitioners were given the privileges of anticipatory bail and directed to surrender before the court below within six weeks upon their undertaking to deposit cash security of Rs.10,000/- each. It is next submitted that due to paucity of money, the petitioners could not make the said deposit within the stipulated time, hence, they could not surrender within the stipulated time. It is next submitted that in the meantime the petitioner Nos.2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 have arranged the money and made the said deposit and the copy of the receipt of same has been annexed with the brief. It is also submitted that the petitioner Nos.1 and 5 namely Rajan Rajwar @ Rajen Rajear and Ravi Gope have not made the said deposit. It is further submitted that now the Petitioner Nos.2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 are ready and willing to surrender before the learned court below and unless six weeks’ extension is granted to them, they will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the time period for the petitioner Nos.2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 to surrender before the court below in terms of the order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025 be extended by six weeks from the date of this order. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the prayer for extension of time for the petitioner Nos.2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 to surrender in the court below in terms of the order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025 is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025 is modified by directing the petitioner Nos.2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 to surrender within six weeks from the date of this order in terms of the order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025. So far as the petitioner Nos.1 and 5 namely Rajan Rajwar @ Rajen Rajear and Ravi Gope are concerned, since they have not made the said deposit, accordingly, this Cr.M.P. stands dismissed against the petitioner Nos.1 and 5 namely Rajan Rajwar @ Rajen Rajear and Ravi Gope. The order dated 28.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.489 of 2025 is modified to the aforesaid extent only. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/