Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170002 (ALL)

AKHILANAND SHAHI v. PROFESSOR P. K. SINGH, REGISTRAR, DR. BHIMRAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY AGRA

CAPL/4753/2024 · 2025-03-07

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13972 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4753 of 2024 Applicant :- Akhilanand Shahi Opposite Party :- Professor P. K. Singh, Registrar, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University Agra Counsel for Applicant :- Amitabh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anurag Verma Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. The case has been called in the revised list. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request for adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non-compliance of the judgement and order dated 22.04.2024 passed in Writ C No. 3590 of 2024. The relevant extract of the same is quoted hereinbelow:- '2. The instant petition has been filed for following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to provide the Degree of petitioner for the course of Bachelor of Pharmacy (B. Pharma) forthwith. ii. Such any other order of direction under the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favor of the petitioners. iii. Allow the writ petition of the petitioner with cost." 3. After argument at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that opposite party no. 1 may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2024, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsels for opposite parties have no objections to the contention aforesaid. 5. In view of the above and without entering into merit of the case, opposite party no. 1 is hereby directed consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2024, with speaking and reasoned order, within period of eight weeks, from the date of certified copy of this order produced before him.' Sri Anurag Verma, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the grievance of the applicant has been redressed by issuing Degree of Bachelor of Pharmacy and forwarded it to the applicant by Speed Post and as per the Track Report, it has been served upon the applicant. The copy of the said Degree and the Track Report has been enclosed as Annexure No. CA-1 to the compliance affidavit filed by the respondent on 06.02.2025. It is further submitted that till date, no objection has been filed by the applicant against the compliance affidavit. After going through the judgment and order passed by the writ Court and the compliance affidavit, it is found that the grievance of the applicant has been redressed by issuing the Degree as such the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench