TARSENG CH. SANGMA v. ROBERT SINGH NONGBRI AND 2 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/36/2025 · 2026-04-17
H S Thangkhiew
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.01 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
Cont.Cas(C). No. 36 of 2025 in WP(C). No. 290 of 2024 (disposed of)
Date of Decision: 17.04.2026
Shri. Tarseng Ch. Sangma, S/o (L) Renold R. Marak, R/o Rongkhon Songgital, Tura, West Garo Hills, District, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
1. Shri. Robert Singh Nongbri, Chief Engineer, PHE Department, Govt. of Meghalaya Shillong. East Khasi Hills.
2. Shri. Saljrang Sangma, Executive Engineer, PHE District Water and Sanitation Mission (DWSM), JJM (Jal Jeevan Mission) Resubelpara, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
3. Smti. Kedia M.G.Momin, Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) Bajengdoba, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
2026:MLHC:346
2
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T.Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Ms. N.G.Shylla, Sr. GA with
Ms. I.Lyngwa, GA.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of the
order dated 20-03-2025, passed in WP(C). No. 290 of 2024 whereby the undisputed amount payable to the writ petitioner had been directed to be paid expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of the order.
2. The Chief Engineer, PHE has filed an affidavit which indicates that there has been no wilful violation or disregard to the order of this Court, but the reasons of not being able to comply with the order as yet is due to the delay in the release of funds by the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Jal Jeevan Mission 2026:MLHC:346
3
which operates on a 90:10 (Central/State) funding pattern, and as such, at this stage they are unable to release the amount of the writ petitioner.
3. On perusal of the affidavit, it is seen that this is not a case of wilful violation, as such, contempt is closed and disposed of.
Judge 2026:MLHC:346 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.17 17:32:40 IST