Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170 (MEG)

TARSENG CH. SANGMA v. ROBERT SINGH NONGBRI AND 2 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/36/2025 · 2026-04-17

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.01 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C). No. 36 of 2025 in WP(C). No. 290 of 2024 (disposed of) Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 Shri. Tarseng Ch. Sangma, S/o (L) Renold R. Marak, R/o Rongkhon Songgital, Tura, West Garo Hills, District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. Shri. Robert Singh Nongbri, Chief Engineer, PHE Department, Govt. of Meghalaya Shillong. East Khasi Hills. 2. Shri. Saljrang Sangma, Executive Engineer, PHE District Water and Sanitation Mission (DWSM), JJM (Jal Jeevan Mission) Resubelpara, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya. 3. Smti. Kedia M.G.Momin, Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) Bajengdoba, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya. …Respondents 2026:MLHC:346 2 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T.Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. N.G.Shylla, Sr. GA with Ms. I.Lyngwa, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 20-03-2025, passed in WP(C). No. 290 of 2024 whereby the undisputed amount payable to the writ petitioner had been directed to be paid expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of the order. 2. The Chief Engineer, PHE has filed an affidavit which indicates that there has been no wilful violation or disregard to the order of this Court, but the reasons of not being able to comply with the order as yet is due to the delay in the release of funds by the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Jal Jeevan Mission 2026:MLHC:346 3 which operates on a 90:10 (Central/State) funding pattern, and as such, at this stage they are unable to release the amount of the writ petitioner. 3. On perusal of the affidavit, it is seen that this is not a case of wilful violation, as such, contempt is closed and disposed of. Judge 2026:MLHC:346 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.17 17:32:40 IST