GYANENDRA GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11051/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169996 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169996 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:275-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11051 of 2024 Petitioner :- Gyanendra Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Sri Paavan Awasthi, Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of opposite party no.4 which is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. Petitioner claims that his double storey house was acquired for the purposes of airport at Ayodhya. The compensation has been paid but rehabilitation has not been done.
4. Learned Standing Counsel says that the petitioner already has a house other than the house which was acquired, a fact which is being denied by the petitioner.
5. This is not a matter where we can decide such factual issues. Petitioner may approach the concerned authorities raising his grievance in the matter which may be got inquired and his entitlement to rehabilitation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 shall be considered and a decision shall be taken with expedition unless there is any legal impediment in this regard in which case the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. Let this exercise be completed within three months.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench