M/S ARAVALI CARGO MOVERS PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7248/2025 · 2025-05-23
Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16997 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16997 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21733-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7248/2025 M/s Aravali Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd., Having Principal Place Of Business At Moti Nagar, 43B, Gopalpura Bypass, Shri Natani Agency,
Mansarovar,
Jaipur,
302020
Having
Gstn 08Aahca9436C1Zp Through Its Director Sapna Agarwal Wife Of Virendra Kumar Agarwal ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Commissioner Of State Tax, Rajasthan Goods And Service Tax, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur
2. Deputy Commissioner, Circle-B, Enforcement Wing-Ii, State Tax, New Building, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Cirlce, Jaipur
3. Union Of India, Through Revenue Secretary Union Of India, Through The Revenue Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001
4. The Principal Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax Commissionerate, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 302005
5. Assistant Commissioner, Anti-Evasion, Rajasthan, Ward-Ii, Circle-I Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur
6. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-I, State Tax, Kar Bhawan, Jhalana, Jaipur, Rajasthan
7. The Assistant Commissioner, Ward-Ii, Circle-A, Enforcement Wing-Ist, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan
8. The Assistant Commissioner B-I, Enforcement Wing-Ii, State Tax, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka For Respondent(s) : Mr. CS Sinha with Mr. Dev Yadav Mr. Kartikeya Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG
[2025:RJ-JP:21733-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-7248/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order 23/05/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length is not pressing this petition with liberty to raise all the issues before the adjudicating officer. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. There is no doubt in eventuality of petitioner filing an appeal along with an application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall taken into consideration the pendency of this petition before this Court.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/15