NETRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/11039/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169969 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169969 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:208-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11039 of 2024 Petitioner :- Netram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devi Prasad Maurya,Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard. The relief prayed for in the writ petition cannot be considered by this Court as the High Court is not supposed to execute or ensure compliance of the interim orders passed by the Civil Court in suit which is still pending and the order therein is for maintenance of status quo. This may involve a factual inquiry as to what was the status quo existing on the date of grant of temporary injunction. The petitioner should pursue the matter before the Court below itself. If any application is filed in this regard, the same shall be considered appropriately in accordance with law. The present petition is dismissed. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 G. Singh/ Rao Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench