Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169934 (ALL)

YOGENDRA KUMAR v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT. HARDOI AND 5 OTHERS

/10884/2024 · 2025-01-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1687-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10884 of 2024 Petitioner :- Yogendra Kumar Respondent :- District Magistrate Distt. Hardoi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Srivastava,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. Some proceedings under Section 3 of U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, UP Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 have been initiated as claimed by the petitioner. After receipt of preliminary inquiry report, as claimed, a show cause notice has been issued to opposite party nos.5 and 6 by the District Magistrate i.e opposite party no.1 as to why his financial and administrative powers be not seized but opposite party nos.5 and 6 have not responded and the matter remains pending. 3. Let the District Magistrate, District- Hardoi look into the matter and do the needful as per law. We have not expressed any opinion on merits of the allegations against opposite party nos.5 and 6. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench