HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2780 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed by accused-applicant seeking bail in Complaint Case no.0316/2024, under Section 376 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that non-bailable warrants have already been issued against the applicant by the learned trial court on account of non-cooperating in the trial. Applicant has already moved an application for cancellation of this anticipatory bail application. Applicant has not cooperated in the trial hence, the liberty granted to the applicant is liable to be cancelled. 4. He submits that the applicant earlier has approached this Court by filing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. which was decided vide order dated 22.08.2024 with a direction that applicant shall apply for bail before the learned trial court which was directed to be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No.5191 of 2021 and Mahdoom Bava vs. Central Bureau of Investigation arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.376 of 2023 and protection was granted to the applicant for a period of two weeks. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was disposed of with these directions, order is on record Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : K.K. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Durgesh Kumar Singh Krishna Veer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) along with counter affidavit however, the applicant by suppressing the material fact has filed the anticipatory bail application. He submits that anticipatory bail application is also liable to be dismissed on account of suppression of material facts. 5. On due consideration to the submission advanced by the parties as well as the counter affidavit filed by the complainant apparently it appears that applicant has misused the liberty granted by the court so also the anticipatory bail application suffers from material concealment and hence, the anticipatory bail application is liable to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed. September 3, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- ABAIL No. 2780 of 2024 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench