ANKIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/9582/2024 · 2025-01-08
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169924 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169924 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1378-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9582 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ankit Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sukh Deo Singh,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anamika Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and Ms. Anamika Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.4.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated . Petitioners also pray for quashing of entire criminal proceeding in the aforesaid case crime number.
3. On 17.12.2024, parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar for verification of compromise.
4. The report of the Senior Registrar of this Court dated 03.01.2025 is on record, according to which, he has verified the compromise on 03.01.2025. The original compromise is on record which has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition.
5. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have decided to withdraw all the cases filed by them against each other including F.I.R. dated 29.10.2024 bearing Case Crime No.238/2024, under Sections 324(4), 324(5), 281, 106 B.N.S., Police Station Musafirkhana, District Amethi.
6. Learned counsel for the parties state that now the parties have settled their dispute amicably and they do not want to pursue this case any further.
7. Intent is clear, the respondent No.4, who is a signatory to the compromise, does not want to press the FIR, therefore, no purpose would be served in allowing the proceedings even if
charge sheet has been filed before the court below to go on considering the nature of the dispute.
8. Accordingly, the impugned FIR, which is the basis to serve consequential proceedings of investigation and thereafter filing of charge sheet, if any, is hereby quashed. Consequently, all proceedings taken consequent to the lodging of the FIR including charge sheet, if any, filed before the court below stand quashed.
9. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed.
10. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this
order to the court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly.
11. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.]
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench