Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169911 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD SAMEER AKHTAR @ SAMEER AKHTAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/11466/2024 · 2025-08-21

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49229 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11466 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohammad Sameer Akhtar @ Sameer Akhtar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arshad Siddiqui,Akshay Singh,Vaibhav Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shailendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following prayer:- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayer that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of against impugned Summoning order dated 07.10.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No.18, Barabanki in case No. 37436/2024, in Crime no. 387/2023, U/S- 452,352,504,506,427,34,379 I.P.C. at Police Station-Kotwali, District-Barabanki, (State Versus Sameer Akhtar and Others) as well as Charge Sheet No. 917A/2023 dated 14.07.2024 as contained in Annexure no.1 & 2 respectively to this application, in the interest of law and Justice." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench