CS No. 1098 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA CS No. 1098 of 2008 AND OA NO. 1237 OF 2008,OA NO. 1238 OF 2008 1. Mrs.P.Seethalakshmi Old No.125 New No.53 Rasappa Chetty Street Chennai 3 2.Mrs.N.S.Parimalam Old No.125 New No.53 Rasappa Chetty Street Chennai 3 3.Mrs.P.A.Kanchanamala No.52/2 Ramasami Street Mannady Chennai 1 4.Mr M.Bhavani Shankar No.14/1 Paramasiva Chetty Street Park Town Chennai 3 5. N.P.Vinayaka Sudaram S/o.Late.N.V.Plani, Hindu, Aged About 63 years, Residing at No.53(125), Rasappa Chetty Street, Park Town, Chennai-600003 6. N.P.Karthikeyan S/o.Late.N.V.Palani, Hindu, Aged About 61 years, Residing at. No.61 A, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 1098 of 2008 Sri Durga Apartments, 6th Cross Street, New Colony Chrompet, Chennai- 600044 7. K.Sathya Bama W/o.Late.K.M.Krishnamurthy, Hindu Aged about 56 years, Residing at No.22/2, Crescent Road, Shenoy Nagar, Ch-30 (Plaintiffs 5 to 7 are brought on record as Legal Heirs of the Deceased 1st Plaintiff as per order dated 26/04/20210 and time extended as per order dated 16/06/2023) Plaintiff(s) Vs 1. Mrs.A.Kausalya No.32 Thirumurthy Street T.Nagar Chennai 17 2.Mr. A.Jayagopal No.32 Thirumurthy Street T.Nagar Chennai 17 3.Mrs.U.Jayashree No.32 Thirumurthy Street T.Nagar Chennai 17 4.Mrs. C.Jayamalini No.32 Thirumurthy Street T.Nagar Chennai 17 5.Mr.V.G.Venkatachalam Plot No.666 Door No.18 48th Street 9th https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 1098 of 2008 Sector K.K.Nagar Chennai 78 Defendant(s) PRAYER The petition is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of OS.Rules r/w Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, praying for partition of the Schedule mentioned properties by metes and bounds, according to the entitlement of plaintiffs and pass a preliminary decree accordingly. b)for future mense profits arising there from. c)For a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their men, servants, agents or anyone acting under them from in any manner dealing with the properties described in the schedule, hereunder, including, mortgaging, alienating and leasing. d)For cost of the suit. For Plaintiff(s): No Appearance For Defendant(s): No Appearance ORDER No representation for the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs' counsel reported no instruction. The matter has been listed today by printing the name of the plaintiffs in the cause list. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the plaintiffs. Accordingly, the suit is dismissed for default. The connected applications are also closed. 27-10-2025 jrs Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 1098 of 2008 R.N.MANJULA J. jrs CS No. 1098 of 2008 AND OA NO. 1237 OF 2008,OA NO. 1238 OF 2008 27-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis