Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1699 (UTT)

KANAK LATA SEMWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/105/2025 · 2025-02-13

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:882 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS No. 105 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sanjay Raturi, learned counsel for the petitioners through V.C. 2. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Learned Standing Counsel Mr. Sushil Vashistha on written instructions informs to this court that the promotion exercise will be carried out only after publishing final seniority list and for the tentative final list the objection(s) have been invited and the process is undergoing for deciding all the objections. 4. In view of the statement as given by the learned Standing Counsel Mr. Sushil Vashistha since the promotion will be proceeded only after final seniority list, there is no useful purpose to keep this writ petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in view of such a statement at this stage. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 13.02.2025 PR 2025:UHC:882