IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7367 of 2024 Date of Decision: 18.06.2025 __________________________________________________________ Nimo Devi …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to allow her to continue in service till she attains the age of 60 years in light of law laid down in CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided along with connected matters on 28.05.2024 titled as Satya Devi Vs. State of H.P. and Others. 2. Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents does not dispute the fact that case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid decision in Satya Devi’s case, therefore, there shall be a direction to the respondents to confer the benefit of the aforesaid decision to the petitioner and allow her to continue in service till she attains the age of 60 years. This, shall, however, be subject to outcome of the SLP filed by the respondents in 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 the aforesaid decision. Interim order dated 29.07.2024 is hereby confirmed. The present petition is disposed in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 18, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)