Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16984 (DEL)

NEERAJ & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

W.P.(C)/5478/2025 · 2025-04-28

Prateek Jalan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 5478/2025 Page 1 of 2 $~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5478/2025 and CM APPL. 24992/2025 NEERAJ & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Katara, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Archana Kumari, Advocate for UOI. Ms. Reema Khorana, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI with Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 28.04.2025 1. The petitioners have filed a representation before the Central Water Commission [“Commission”] on 07.03.2025, alleging that they are entitled to family pension and other death cum retirement benefits in respect of late Sh. Satpal, who worked as a Chowkidar in the Commission. 2. There were some controversy between the various claimants to the estate of late Sh. Satpal and it appears that the petitioners and their mother have also filed a Civil Suit no. CS DJ 205720/2016, in this regard, which resulted in a judgment dated 17.08.2020. 3. The representation of the petitioners is, according to them, in consonance with the judgment of the Civil Court. 4. The only relief sought by learned counsel for the petitioners, at this This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2025 at 16:17:55 W.P.(C) 5478/2025 Page 2 of 2 stage, is for consideration of the petitioners’ representation by the Commission and disposal thereof in a time bound manner. 5. Having regard to the limited relief sought, Ms. Archana Kumari, learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, on instructions, submits that the petitioners’ representation will be disposed of within a period of three months from today. 6. The respondents may also call for any clarification or records required from the petitioners in support of their case. 7. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above submission, without any observation affecting the merits of the petitioners case. 8. Pending application also stands disposed of. PRATEEK JALAN, J APRIL 28, 2025 Uk/kb/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2025 at 16:17:55