IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWPOA No. 715 of 2019. Decided on : 11 th September, 2025. Budhi Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Dy. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a prayer for withdrawal of the petition with permission to file fresh on the same cause of action on the ground that inadvertently the averments in the petition have been made in such a manner that will create legal impediment in granting the prayer in favour of the petitioner. Thus, a formal defect appears to have occurred in the petition. 2. Prayer is not opposed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 11th September, 2025. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?