Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16981 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/9233/2018 · 2025-07-28

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28408] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9233/2018 Anil Kumar S/o Mahendra Singh, R/o Village Jatan, Post Raslana, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with passage of time, the prayer made in the instant petition has become infructuous, therefore, he does not want to press the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as not press. 3. Stay application and any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /166