Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16981 (KAR)

M/S M V V SATYANARAYANA v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/11128/2021 · 2025-06-11

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19921 WP No. 11128 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.11128 OF 2021 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. M.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, NO.673, H.NO.6-1-136/3M, 1ST FLOOR, MEHER RATHNA COMPLEX, BALRAM COLONY, WALKER TOWN, PADMA RAO NAGAR, SECUNDERABAD-560025 REPRESENTED BY SRI M. BHIMA SHANKAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VASU DEVA NAIDU S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI. 2. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER/CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, 18, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE-46. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER/WEST/CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, 18, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE-46. 4. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER/ WEST-II/CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, 18, MILLERS ROAD, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19921 WP No. 11128 of 2021 BANGALORE-46. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RE-CALL THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-D DEBARRING THE PETITIONER FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE RE-TENDER OF THE SUBJECT CONTRACT AND HAS NO RIGHT TO DEBAR THE PETITIONER FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE BID FOR EXECUTING ANY WORK BEING TENDERED BY THE SAID RAILWAY DIVISION AND ALSO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO OPEN THE TENDERS IN TENDER NOTICE NO.YNK-PKD-40 & YNK-PKD-41 WHERE IN THE PETITIONER IS ONE OF THE PARTICIPANT. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 26.03.2025 the office objections have not been complied with. 2. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE YKL/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20