Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16981 (GAU)

JAYKRISHNA SARMA AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/5671/2022 · 2025-03-25

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170472022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5671/2022 JAYKRISHNA SARMA AND 2 ORS S/O- LATE KAMALESWAR SARMA, VILL. AND P.O.- PATACHARKUCHI, P.S.- PATACHARKUCHI, DIST.- BAJALI, ASSAM, PIN- 781326. 2: DIBAKOR PHUKON S/O AGESWAR PHUKON R/O- RUPNAGAR NAMGHAR PATH P.O.- C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786003. 3: SATISH PATGIRI S/O- LATE BEPIN PATGIRI VILL. AND P.O.- BAMAKHATA P.S.- PATACHARKUCHI DIST.- BAJALI PIN- 781325 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, Page No.# 2/3 IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3. 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE SCREENING COMMITTEE TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRPERSON IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 5:THE UNDER SECRETARY (E) TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 6:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM BELTOLA MAIDAMGAON GUWAHATI-29 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H RAJBARBHUIYAN, MR. A MANNAF,MD A S ALI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, SC, AG,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 26/03/2025 Mr. A. Mannaf, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous and, therefore, the same be closed. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. N. Upadhyay, leaned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department, Assam; Mr. B. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Office of the AG (A&E) Assam and Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, Assam, are present on behalf of the respective respondents. On the submission of the petitioner’s counsel, this writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant