Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169808 (ALL)

KALPANA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12159/2024 · 2025-02-27

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11890 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12159 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kalpana Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Raj Ojha,Shivendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2, and Sri Arun Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has no objection. 4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench