Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16980 (GAU)

ANUPAM KUMAR NATH v. THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/5529/2021 · 2025-08-13

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170492021 2025:GAU-AS:10857 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5529/2021 ANUPAM KUMAR NATH SON OF SRI PRIYARAM NATH R/O VILL- HATIBAT P.O. NAGABANDHA P.S. MIKIRBHETA DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM PIN NO. 782106 VERSUS THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, GAUHATI HIGH COURT, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI, PIN NO. 781001 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LAW REMEMBRANCER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN NO. 781006 3:DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MORIGAON ASSAM DIST. MORIGAON PIN-78210 Advocate for the petitioner(s): None appears Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. TJ Mahanta, Senior Advocate & Standing Counsel, GHC B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 14.08.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. 2. Mr. TJ Mahanta, the learned Senior Counsel, who is also the learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati High Court assisted by Ms. P Sarma, the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3. 3. The issue involved in the instant proceedings pertains to a challenge to the advertisement dated 24.09.2021 whereby the eligibility criteria has been mentioned for the post of Peon as Class VIII passed but Class XII not passed. 4. It is seen that in various judgments passed by this Court, the Notification No.1 dated 04.01.2021 has been upheld. The advertisement dated 24.09.2021 is a consequence to the Notification No.1 dated 04.01.2021. Under such circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the instant proceedings, for which, the writ petition stands dismissed. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant