Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16979 (KAR)

SRI NARASIMHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7266/2021 · 2025-07-10

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25192 WP No. 7266 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7266 OF 2021 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI NARASIMHA S/O LATE PAPAJAYYA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDENT OF KAMANAKEE HUNDI VILLAGE MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE-577301 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJULA D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE THASILDAR OFFICER OF THE THASILDAR MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE-577102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNTHA K., HCGP) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25192 WP No. 7266 of 2021 THIS W.P. IS FILED PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DTD 05.01.2021 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-H.DIRECT THE R-2 TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS NARASIHMA, D/O PAPAIAH INSTEAD OF NARASIMHA, S/O PAPAJAIAH IN THE FORM NO.10 AND ALL OTHER REVENUE RECORDS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 05.01.2021 (Annexure-H) interalia sought for a direction to the respondent No.2 to correct the name of the petitioner as Narasimha S/o Papajaiah, instead of Narasamma D/o Papajaiah. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petitioner has sought for a direction to change the name mentioned in Form No.10 issued by the Land Tribunal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25192 WP No. 7266 of 2021 4 In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that, the respondent No.2 has rightly issued the Endorsement dated 17.9.2005 (Annexure-G) rejecting the claim made by the petitioner herein. Hence, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49