Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:28470-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. A. (DB) No. 679 of 2025
-------- Ganga Paharia, aged about -57 years, Son of-Lengra Suriya Paharya, Resident of Village-Sanmani, Post Office and Police Station-Barhet, Dist. Sahibganj
... ... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Respondent
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-------- For the Appellant : Mr. Raja Ravi S. Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
--------
Order No. 03/ Dated: 15th September, 2025
Heard Mr. Raja Ravi S. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vishwanath Roy, learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with B.P. No. 68 of 2025 arising out of Tinpahar P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. It has been alleged that the appellant was taking three children to Delhi on the allurement of money and new clothes and those three children were subsequently recovered.
4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 06.02.2025. It has further been submitted that all the children have been recovered.
5. Mr. Vishwanath Roy, learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant but has not disputed the fact that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent.
6. Regard being had to the above, we while setting aside the order
2025:JHHC:28470-DB
2 Cr. A. (DB) No. 679 of 2025 dated 26.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with B.P. No. 68 of 2025 arising out of Tinpahar P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-1ST Class, Rajmahal.
7. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
15.09.2025 Basant/Arpit