Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16977 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR v. SMT. RAJ DULARI DEVI AND 2 OTHERS

A227/1410/2025 · 2025-02-13

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20857 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1410 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Respondent :- Smt. Raj Dulari Devi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mirzapur to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Suit No. 158 of 2021 (Vinod Kumar and another vs. Smt. Raj Dulari Devi and another) within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that 6-C application filed by petitioner in Civil Suit No. 158 of 2021 (Vinod Kumar and another vs. Smt. Raj Dulari Devi and another) is pending consideration and till date the same has not been decided by the court concerned. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mirzapur to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 158 of 2021 (Vinod Kumar and another vs. Smt. Raj Dulari Devi and another), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad