AMIT PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/11044/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:268-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11044 of 2024 Petitioner :- Amit Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aman Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Sri Alok Sharan & Sri Anupam Dwivedi, Advocates have filed Vakalatnamas on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3 respectively which are taken on record.
3. Heard.
4. The petitioner's claim under the Pradhan Mantry Awas Yojana has been declined while publishing the final list on the ground that petitioner is not a resident of Lucknow. Whether the petitioner is resident of Lucknow or not cannot be decided in a writ proceedings. Petitioner may, if he has proof of his residence at Lucknow, apprise the concerned authorities in this regard who shall reconsider the claim accordingly if there is sufficient proof in this regard.
5. With these observations/ direction, the petition is disposed of. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench