Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16974 (GAU)

JAY CHARAN DEKA, v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS

CS/210/2025 · 2025-08-25

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170052025 2025:GAU-AS:11394 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./210/2025 JAY CHARAN DEKA, (CLASS II CIVIL CONTRACTOR) S/O LATE KHARGESHWAR DEKA, R/O VILL. KENDUKONA, P.O. PUTHIMARI, P.S. KAMALPUR, PIN 781380, DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI DEVELOPMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA REJUVENATION, NEW DELHI, PIN 110001 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN 781006 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM BASISTHA GUWAHATI PIN 781029 4:THE BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD REPRESENTED BY WATER RESOURCE DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM BASISTHA Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI PIN 781029 5:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (AUDIT) MAIDAMGAON KRISHNAPUR BELTOLA TINIALI GUWAHATI PIN 781029 6:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PALASHBARI TOWN PROTECTION WATER RESOURCE CIRCLE GUWAHATI 781009 7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GUWAHATI WEST WATER RESOURCE DIVISION BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N K KALITA, MR D DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, AG,SC, WATER RESOURCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 26.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. N.K. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P Seyie for respondent Nos.2, 3 & 7 and Ms. Tinlung for respondent No.5. 2. Though the present application is filed and structured as Review Petition, however, in substance this is an application for correction of typographical error. This court under its order dated 27.03.2024 disposed of WP(C) No.7777/2022 directing to pay the Page No.# 3/3 petitioner the admitted amount of contractual liability, however, it is brought on record that the admitted amount reflected in the affidavit filed by the Water Resources Department (respondent No.7), is recorded as Rs.6,53,509.00 instead of Rs.9,28,190.00. 3. In view of the aforesaid, it is provided that the amount reflected at the second paragraph of the second page of the judgment, wherein the admitted amount is reflected as Rs.6,53,509.00 be read as Rs.9,28,190.00 as admitted by the Water Resources Department in their affidavit. 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands allowed to the aforesaid extent. 5. The order dated 07.03.2024 passed in WP(C) No.7777/2022 be read along with the order passed today. Accordingly, the review petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant