( 2025:JHHC:17051 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5092 of 2025 ------ Akhtar Ansari @ Md. Akhtar Miyan, aged about 45 years, son of Salim Ansari, Resident of Village Pathra Mal Tola, P.O. and P.S. –Godda (T), District –Godda. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Aniket Jaiswal, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sunderpahari P.S. Case No.21 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 74, 75 and 64(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed rape upon the victim and outraged her modesty. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, drawing attention of this Court to annexure-2 at page no.25 of the brief which is the copy of the certified copy of the compromise petition filed by the informant in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Godda, that a settlement has arrived at between the parties. It is further submitted that the allegation of rape is out and out a manufactured story to harass the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –18 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.04.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda, in connection with Sunderpahari P.S. Case No.21 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/