Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16966 (UTT)

AKASH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2308/2025 · 2025-12-01

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 2308 of2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Through V.C.) 1. Mr. Basant Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A.with Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Akash, S/o Tarak Goldar is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 12.08.2025, registered as FIR No. 242 of 2025 at P.S. Transit Camp District U.S. Nagar wherein the present applicant along with unknown persons has been implicated and charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 190 and 191(2) of BNS 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, and, in fact, from the contents of the FIR there was no any intention or motive on the part of the applicant to commit the offence and they all are friends and in a drunken condition at the time of alleged incident. It is also argued that the applicant has no previous criminal history and one of the co-accused granted interim protection by the Coordinate Bench in WPCRL No. 1288 of 2025. 5. On the previous date, the State Counsel was directed to get instructions and today on instructions, Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. apprise to this Court that the injuries are grievous in nature and the investigation is still going on, however, he has not disputed this fact that other co-accused granted interim protection by the Coordinate Bench. 6. Be that as it may, on perusal of the FIR, prima facie, it appears that there is no any such intention to commit the crime, therefore, taking into consideration all these aspects this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Akash be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 01.12.2025 Parul