PAWAN KUMAR ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5710/2025 · 2025-07-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16965 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16965 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:18650 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5710 of 2025
------ Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Singh, aged about 18 years, son of Ajay Kumar Singh, resident of Village-Patila, P.O.- Pathak pager, P.S.-Tarashi Patila, Dist.-Palamu
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashikant Jaiswal, Advocate
: Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate
: Ms. Aparna Sharma, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 10.07.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barwadih P.S. Case No.81 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted the motorcycle of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has not been put to T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph no.15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.20 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.02.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 23 of the bail application and charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Latehar, in connection with Barwadih P.S. Case No.81 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/