- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6526 CRP No. 94 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 94 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SRI N SUNDARA RAJU S/O LT K NANJUNDAPPAA AGED 64 YEARS R/AT NO 16, SANEGURUVANAHALLI BASAVESHWARANAGAR BENGALURU 560079 2. SRI N YOGESHA S/O LT K NANJUNDAPPA AGED 51 YEARS R/AT NO 1022, II FLOOR 5TH MAIN, III BLOCK, III STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGAR BENGALURU 560079 3. 4. SMT N LEELAVATHI W/O M. ANAND D/O LT K NANJUNDAPPA AGED 58 YEARS R/T NO 1, 2ND CROSS 9TH B MAIN, VIJAYANGAR BENGALURU 560040 SMT. N. NAGARATHNA W/O A NARAYANASWAMY Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6526 CRP No. 94 of 2022 D/O LATE K NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT KANNUR VILLAGE & POST BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-562149. PETITIONER NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE REP BY THEIR GPA HOLDER PETITIONER NO.1 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H N BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S ITTINA PROPERTIES PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INDIAN COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO 380 ITTINA CENTRE, 16TH MAIN ST JOHNS HOSPITAL ROAD SARJAPURA ROAD, III BLOCK KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560034 REP BY ITS DIRECTOR AND IN CHARGE SRI MANU ITTINA S/O I. MAHABALESHWARAPPA …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V B SHIVA KUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.12.2021 PASSED ON IA IN OS No.4385/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE C/c XXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH 38), REJECTING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 1(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6526 CRP No. 94 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 13.02.2025 stating that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.4385/2019 was dismissed for non-prosecution on 09.12.2024. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just expections. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL