BHIM SAIN GUPTA v. UOI (M/O URBAN DEVELOPMENT) & ORS
W.P.(C)/16508/2004 · 2025-02-17
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16963 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16963 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16508/2004
BHIM SAIN GUPTA
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. Rupender Sharma, Ms. Sakshi Garg and Ms. Nupu Mantoo, Advocates.
versus
UOI (M/O URBAN DEVELOPMENT) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sawan Kumar and Mr. Satyam Singh, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R %
04.04.2025
1. Mr. Gugnani, learned counsel for the petitioner states that details of re-entry charges were provided only two days back, consequent to which, a sum of Rs.8,05,537/- has been deposited towards re-entry charges by way of bank transfer. He states that the respondents now have to take steps to withdraw the re-entry.
2. Mr. Shukla, Ld. CGSC, on instructions, submits that subject to the petitioner completing any other formalities, the requisite steps would be taken without any further delay.
3. Considering that re-entry charges stand deposited, the respondents shall take the requisite steps within three weeks from today.
4. Renotify on 01.05.2025.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J APRIL 4, 2025 ga This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:41:39