Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16962 (KAR)

SRI NEELAKANTA S N v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED

WP/4404/2021 · 2025-01-10

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1038 WP No. 4404 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4404 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. NEELAKANTA.S.N. S/O NAGARAJA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A SOORAKUNTE VILLAGE, NANGELI POST, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADINARAYANAPPA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, MARKETING DIVISION, BENGALURU DIVISIONAL OFFICE, INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, NO.28, 1ST FLOOR, ANJUMAN KAY ARR TOWER, P.KALINGA RAO ROAD, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, (R.S.) BENGALURU. 2. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, ALUMINI ASSOCIATION, UAS CONVENTION CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCES, VETERINARY COLLEAGE HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560 024. …RESPONDENTS (R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1038 WP No. 4404 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition was filed in the year 2021 i.e., on 01.03.2021 and the office has raised certain objections on 01.03.2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from four years. So far, office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16