Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16958 (ALL)

JAGMAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A227/1738/2025 · 2025-02-27

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:28826 Court No. - 79 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1738 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagmal Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhinav Singh,Ajeet Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant petition has been preferred with following prayer:- "(I) Set-aside the judgment/order dated 02/01/2025 passed by Additional District & Session Judge, Court No. 11, Saharanpur in Criminal Revision No. 400 of 2024 (Yashpal Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and Another). (II) Set-aside the summoning order dated 10/03/2023 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. (Crime Against the Women), Saharanpur in Criminal Complaint No. 1829 of 2022 (Bharti Vs. Jagmal and Others)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners pressed all the grounds whatsoever has been taken through the instant petition through which, it has been apprised that there is hardly any attraction of sections in which the petitioners have been summoned and all these grounds have not been taken into consideration while passing the order dated 10.03.2023. Being aggrieved with order dated 10.03.2023, petitioners preferred revision which was also rejected vide order dated 02.01.2025 which has been challenged through the instant petition. 4. Learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant petition. 5. Be that as it may, no useful purpose shall be served by way of giving time for exchange of counter and rejoinder affidavit and keeping the matter pending before this Court and as such, learned Court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. (Crime Against the Women), Saharanpur/concerned court is hereby directed to expedite and finalize the proceedings of Criminal Complaint No. 1829 of 2022 (Bharti Vs. Jagmal and Others), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 12 months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order before him without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, but after giving full opportunity of hearing to both sides. 6. It is also directed to the parties that no unnecessary adjournment shall be sought unless the same is unavoidable and both the parties are directed to cooperate with the learned court concerned for achieving the directions as made above. 7. However, it is made clear that till the disposal of the above mentioned Criminal Complaint No. 1829 of 2022, no coercive action shall be initiated against the petitioners. 8. The instant petition is hereby disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 28.2.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad