IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9631 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Pradeep Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 20, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?