Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8780 WP No. 4170 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 4170 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
M S SHIVAKUMAR S/O SHIVAPPA M N AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT KASABA HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA MALALI, SAKELSHPURA HASSAN-573134 (MEMBER OF GRAM PANCHAYAT)
2.
SAGAR J A S/O ASHOKA JP AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT NEAR JANEKERE GOVT SCHOOL, JANEKERE VILLAGE, AREKERE POST SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN -573134
3.
GOUTHAM MH S/O HARSHA M J AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT MALALI VILLAGE SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN -573134
4.
M D DHANYA KUMAR S/O M S DEVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS MALALI VILLAGE SAKLESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN -573134
5.
TEJESH T R S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS SULLAKKI VILLAGE, AREKERE POST SAKLESHPUR TALUK,
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8780 WP No. 4170 of 2025
HASSAN -573134 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. KAVITHA H C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRL. DIRECTOR DEPORTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VIDHAN SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, SAKALESHPURA, SAKALESHPUR HASSAN DISTRICT-5731345 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER
3.
MALALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALALI GRAMA, KASABA HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK 573134 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
4.
PRAVEEN S C S/O S R CHANDRASHEKHAR HALESANTHAVERI, SAKALESHPUR, HASSAN 573134 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI.V., AGA FOR R-1;
SRI. PRATHEEP K.C., ADVOCATE FOR R-2;
SRI. N.S.DEVARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R-3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH WORK
ORDER DATED. 05.02.2025 PASSED BY THE R-2 / MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, WHICH IS AS PER ANNEXURE-A, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8780 WP No. 4170 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous, in as much as the fair has concluded.
2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed has having become infructuous.
3. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE
GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7