Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169527 (ALL)

RAJ KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/10558/2024 · 2025-01-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1584-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10558 of 2024 Petitioner :- Raj Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Industrial Development Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra,Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sharad Tewari Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Affidavit on behalf of opposite party no.3 and counter affidavit on behalf of opposite party no.2 have been filed today which are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no.2. 3. Ms. Kritika Jyotsana, District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Sri Hari Pratap Sahi, A.C.E.O., UPEIDA have joined the proceedings through video conferencing. They have informed the Court that on account of pendency of a suit for cancellation of sale deed executed by the vendor in favour of the petitioner, some time was used for verification of the aforesaid fact and after verification that there is no injunction in the said suit in favour of the plaintiff who is son of vendor, the sale consideration has been given to the petitioner on 21.12.2024. Therefore, the delay in this regard is not deliberate nor due to any other lapse. 4. We accept the explanation offered and as payment has already been made now, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication nor does the petitioner's counsel press any other relief. 5. Accordingly, we dispose of this writ petition. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench