Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16951 (GAU)

NUR MAHAMMAD SK v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/4430/2025 · 2025-08-10

Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170292025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4430/2025 NUR MAHAMMAD SK S/O ABUWAL MAZID @ ABDUL MAZID, R/O WARD NO. 10, BIDYAPARA, DHUBRI, P.O., P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-1 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHUBRI P.O. AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) DHUBRI P.O. AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301 5:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI-01 6:THE STATE COORDINATOR OF NRC Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX 2ND FLOOR BONPHOOL NAGAR DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 7:SAFIOR RAHMAN SARKAR ADVOCATE C/O DHUBRI BAR ASSOCIATION P.O. AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-78330 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SIKDAR, J A SIKDAR,MS M SARMA,MR. S I TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NRC,SC, ECI,SC, F.T,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 11.08.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Owing to certain inherent defects in the writ petition, Mr. A. R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition and to file again. He also prays liberty to withdraw the vakalatnama as well as the annexures. All the respondents are represented. The prayer is partly allowed. Accordingly, the vakalatnama filed in this writ petition shall be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner by retaining photocopy of the same in the record. However, as annexures are all Page No.# 3/3 photocopies, the same is not required to be returned. The matter stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant