Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169502 (ALL)

HAYAT UN NABI KHAN v. SHANMUGA SUNDARAM M.K. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND ANOTHER

CAPL/4619/2024 · 2025-02-21

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11334 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4619 of 2024 Applicant :- Hayat Un Nabi Khan Opposite Party :- Shanmuga Sundaram M.K. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ghaus Beg Counsel for Opposite Party :- Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. The case has been called in the revised list. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request for adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. On the other hand, Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel, holding brief of Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the difference of pay/honorarium has been paid to the applicant by crediting the amount in the account of the applicant on 10.02.2025. It is further submitted that the compliance affidavit has been filed stating therein that after the final calculation, the amount has been credited in the account of the applicant and till date, no objection has been filed by the applicant. The documents in support thereof, has been enclosed as Annexure no. A-1, as such, the present contempt application may be dismissed as infructuous and the notices may be discharged. After going through the record, it is found that the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with by making payment of difference of pay/honorarium to the applicant. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 21.2.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench