IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No. 744 of 2019 Date of decision: 19.09.2025 Pankaj Lalit ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Abhijit, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening circumstances, the prayer made in the petition has been rendered infructuous and for the aforesaid reason, no purpose shall be served by further prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 19th September, 2025 Judge (Shamsh Tabrez) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?