Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16950 (CHH)

Umesh Dewangan v. Smt. Sarojani Dewangan

FA/108/2016 · 2025-09-23

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:49070 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 108 of 2016 Umesh Dewangan S/o Late Laxman Lal Dewangan, Aged About 42 Years R/o Dewangan Mohalla, Sanjay Nagar, Ward No.4, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Appellant versus 1 - Smt. Sarojani Dewangan W/o Late Chandrakumar Dewangan, Aged About 35 Years 2 - Sanjay Kumar Dewangan W/o Late Chandrakumar Dewangan, Aged About 20 Years Both are R/o Behind The Silk And Kabadi Plastic, Kumharpara, Below The Talab, Sanjay Nagar, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Appellant : None present For Respondents : Mr. Naveen Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 24/09/2025 1. There was no representation on behalf of appellant on 11.04.2025, 09.05.2025 and 14.07.2025. 2. Considering that appellant remained un-represented continuously for three dates, fixed date S.P.C. was issued by the Court. According to BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.25 10:42:09 +0530 2 report received, appellant was served on 17.08.2025, however, again there is no representation on behalf of appellant. 3. In the aforementioned facts of the case, it is appearing that appellant has lost interest in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram