Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169477 (MAD)

M. MUTHURAM v. S. ABHASH KUMAR IPS

CONT P(MD)/218/2025 · 2025-04-22

Battu Devanand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No.2578 of 2024 M.Muthuram .. Petitioner Vs. S.Abhash Kumar I.P.S., The Director, Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Department, No.17, Rukmani, Lakshimpathy Road, Egmore, Chennai. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor/1st Respondent in W.P(MD).No.2578 of 2024 for willful disobedience of order dated 04.06.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Aruljenifer For Respondent : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 ORDER This contempt case has been filed complaining willful disobedience of the respondent in implementing the order dated 04.06.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.2578 of 2024 passed by this Court. 2. While disposing the said writ petition, this Court directed the first respondent therein, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.01.2024 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the representation of the petitioner was not considered and order was not passed, within the time stipulated by this Court. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that after receipt of the copy of the order in the writ petition, the respondent informed the learned counsel for the petitioner, _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 in reply to his notice, that in view of the order passed by this Court on 28.07.2023 in W.P(MD).Nos.18228, 18229 and 18230 of 2023, the request of the petitioner made in his representation could not be considered. Even thereafter, the present contempt case is filed. He further submits that the Officer, who is impleded as respondent in this contempt case, retired from service on 31.03.2025. However, the present Director, Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Services Department, issued proceedings in RC.No.1425/B5/2024 dated 07.03.2025 informing the petitioner that in view of the pendency of the above writ petitions before this Court, they are not in a position to promote him to the post of Assistant District Officer formally/gratually. 5. Having regard to the submissions of both sides, it appears that the representation of the petitioner dated 23.01.2024 has been considered by the respondent in compliance of the order dated 04.06.2024 in W.P(MD).No.2578 of 2024 and the same was communicated to the petitioner's counsel vide letter dated 21.10.2024. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 6. In view of the above factual position, in my considered view, no further adjudication is required in this petition. 5. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. 22.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Rmk To S.Abhash Kumar I.P.S., The Director, Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Department, No.17, Rukmani, Lakshimpathy Road, Egmore, Chennai. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 BATTU DEVANAND, J. Rmk Cont.P.(MD) No.218 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No.2578 of 2024 Dated : 22.04.2025 _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis