Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16943 (RAJ)

BHEEMA BHAI RAJA KATARA S/O RAJA BHAI KATARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5611/2025 · 2025-05-01

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3722/2025 Bharat Gogan Muchhar S/o Goganbhai Muchhar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Narmada Dairy, Vanan, Taluk, Police Station Ranvav, District Porbandar, Gujrat. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5611/2025 Bheema Bhai Raja Katara S/o Raja Bhai Katara, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Hathi Chemicals Ke Pass, Maharaja Bag Road, Janta Mol Ki Seri Jubeli, Police Station Udyognagar, District Porbandar Gujrat. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Shakir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0047/2025 registered at Police Station-Manoharpur, District-Jaipur (Rural) for the offences under Sections 19, 54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. [2025:RJ-JP:18294] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3722/2025] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that charge-sheet has been filed and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner-Bharat Gogan Muchhar. The petitioner- Bharat Gogan Muchhar is behind the Bar since 25.02.2025. The petitioner-Bheema Bhai Raja Katara is behind the Bar since 03.04.2025 and only allegation against him is that he is owner of the seized vehicle. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Bharat Gogan Muchhar S/o Goganbhai Muchhar (2) Bheema Bhai Raja Katara S/o Raja Bhai Katara shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned [2025:RJ-JP:18294] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3722/2025] trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/182-183