RAM SAJIVAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/12575/2024 · 2025-09-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169419 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169419 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12575 of 2024 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Chandan Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Virendra Kumar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.345 of 2024, under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, registered at Police Station Gosaiganj, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 30.08.2024 against 8 persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant has agreed to purchase Plot No. C29 (ND-129) measuring 1500 sq. ft. from Reality Investment Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Nirvana), Lucknow and he paid Rs.3,64,000/-, which was more than half of the agreed sale consideration, but possession of the land was not delivered. Thereafter, a sale deed was executed by Ram Sajivan, Director of the Company, and possession of the plot was delivered to the informant's husband but later on it transpired that the property transferred to the complainant's husband was in Khasra No.474 and not in Khasra No.478. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 5. Two co-accused persons Ankit Khare and Balvir Singh has been granted bail in the present case by means of orders dated 30.01.2025 and 04.09.2025 passed in Bail Application Nos.849 of 2025 and 47829 of 2024. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Kumar Tripathi, Aditya Vikram Singh, Chandan Srivastava, Pranshu Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Sajivan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the bail application but he could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime on the ground of parity. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant - Ram Sajivan - be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 8, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 12575 of 2024 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench