Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16941 (JHR)

PARWEJKHAN ALIAS PARWEJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5417/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:18234 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5417 of 2025 ------ Parwej Khan @ Parwej Ansari, aged about 21 years, S/o Late Rajul Khan, resident of Village –Katri, P.O. & P.S. –Gumla, District –Gumla, Jharkhand. Present Address –Vill -Barwe Nagar, Chainpur, P.O. & P.S. – Chainpur, District -Gumla … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gumla (Mahila) P.S. Case No.06 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the brother-in-law (Dewar) of the deceased has committed her dowry death, by treating her with cruelty and harassing her in connection of demand of dowry of Rs.1,00,000/- cash and an Apache Motorcycle. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that in the post-mortem report, cause of death has been reserved till the F.S.L. report is received, but the F.S.L. report has not yet been received. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.04.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 01.07.2025 in B.A. No. 5220 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Gumla, in connection with Gumla (Mahila) P.S. Case No.06 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/