Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16940 (AP)

S. Veerabhadra Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/12002/2025 · 2025-07-03

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010228932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) r B FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAC^^ WRIT PETITION NO: 12002 OF 2025 ^ IN Between: S. Veerabhadra Rao, S/o Talupulu, Aged about 64 Years, Occ. Contractor, R/o Nagulapalli (V), U.Kothapalli(M), Kakinada District. ...Petitionej: AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amarvathi. 2. The District Collector, Kakinada District, Kakinada 3. The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Kakinada, Kakinada District 4. The Executive Engineer, P.R.I Division Kakinada, Kakinada District. 5. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary Finance Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amarvathi. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action on the part of the respondents herein not releasing and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs. 2,64,213.74/- with and interest to the petitioner for execution of works as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14, and^l of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs. 2,64,213.74/-with interest to the petitioner forthwith. -- IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs. 2,64,213.74/- with interest to the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. ^ Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. SAMEERA BOKKA ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.5; GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following order: APHC010228932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 12002/2025 Between: 1.S. VEERABHADRA RAO,, S/0 TALUPULU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/0 NAGULAPALLI (V), U.KOTHAPALLI(M), . KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA 3.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT 4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R.I DIVISION KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: ip 1 2 I.SAMEERA BOKKA Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms.Sameera Bokka, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development. Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, has submitted the Written Instructions dated 20.06.2025 furnished by the Executive Engineer (FAC), PRI Division, Kakinada, Kakinada District. A of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the gross amount to be paid to the Petitioner is Rs.2,99,114/-. The statutory deductions are for a sum of Rs.36,014/- and the balance amount (net amount) to be paid to the Petitioner as full and final settlement is for a sum of Rs.2,63,100/-. The Writ Petitioner admits for this amount of Rs.2,63,100/-. In this view of the matter, there shall be a direction to the Respondents to complete the entire administrative process, intra department and inter-department, within a period of eight (8) weeks, by way of Cooperation and Co-ordination, and transfer the said amount to the account of the Petitioner within four (4) weeks thereafter. \ 2. copy 4. 4 With these directions and observations, this Writ Petition 5. stands allowed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of 6. this order. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU [3EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secret^t Buildings, Velagapudi, Amarvathi. 2. The District Collector, Kakinada District, Kakinada ^ 3. The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Kakinadp, Kakinada District 4. The Executive Engineer, P.R.I Division Kakinada, Kakinada District/^ 5. The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amarvathi. 6. One CC to M/s. Sameera Bokka, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Dev, High Court of Andhra^ Pradesh [OUT] 8. Two CCs to GP for Finance & Planning, High Court of Andhra PradeslT [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 12002 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS