APHC010227242003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2619/2003 Between: 1. GANDIKOTA VENKATA RAMANAIAH., S/O.PANCHALAIAH, WORKING AS TEMPORARY MESSENGER, SBI, ASHOK NAGAR, GUDUR, NELLORE DISTRICT. 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA NELLORE, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, GUDUR BRANCH, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, TIRUPATI. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Mandamus; (i) declaring the action of the respondents in not absorbing the petitioner as Messenger, even though candidates below his name are absorbed, is illegal, arbitrary and offen declare the action of the respondents excluding the service rendered prior to attaining majority as illegal, arbitrary and vodi; (iii) compel the respondents to absorb the petitioner as permanent messenger, from candidates who are below the petitioner in the panel were absorbed, with all consequential benefits like pay, seniority etc., and (iv) to grant such. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2619/2003 GANDIKOTA VENKATA RAMANAIAH., S/O.PANCHALAIAH, WORKING AS TEMPORARY MESSENGER, SBI, ASHOK NAGAR, GUDUR, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND STATE BANK OF INDIA NELLORE, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, GUDUR BRANCH, NELLORE DISTRICT. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, TIRUPATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be d to issue a Writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Mandamus; (i) declaring the action of the respondents in not absorbing the petitioner as Messenger, even though candidates below his name are absorbed, is illegal, arbitrary and offends Art.14 of the Constitution of India; (ii) declare the action of the respondents excluding the service rendered prior to attaining majority as illegal, arbitrary and vodi; (iii) compel the respondents to absorb the petitioner as permanent messenger, from the date on which the candidates who are below the petitioner in the panel were absorbed, with all consequential benefits like pay, seniority etc., and (iv) to grant such. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI GANDIKOTA VENKATA RAMANAIAH., S/O.PANCHALAIAH, WORKING AS TEMPORARY MESSENGER, SBI, ASHOK NAGAR, ...PETITIONER STATE BANK OF INDIA NELLORE, REP. BY ITS BRANCH THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be d to issue a Writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Mandamus; (i) declaring the action of the respondents in not absorbing the petitioner as Messenger, even though candidates below his name are ds Art.14 of the Constitution of India; (ii) declare the action of the respondents excluding the service rendered prior to attaining majority as illegal, arbitrary and vodi; (iii) compel the respondents to the date on which the candidates who are below the petitioner in the panel were absorbed, with all consequential benefits like pay, seniority etc., and (iv) to grant such. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 3432 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing of the above Writ Petition and grant such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M VENKATA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. E MADAN MOHAN RAO 3 The Court made the following order: Sri T.V.Suman, learned counsel, representing the office of Sri M.Venkata Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the counsel on record is no more and the petitioner has not responded. Hence, prayed to pass appropriate orders. Since the matter pertains to the year 2003 and the petitioner has not been pursuing the case, it shows that he has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 11.08.2025 MP 4 209 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2619 of 2003 Dated: 11.08.2025 MP