Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 169364 (ALL)

RAM MILAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/9191/2024 · 2025-09-15

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9191 of 2024 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Aseem Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Sri Anil Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 5. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed that opposite party nos. 2 to 4 may be directed to conduct the fair investigation of F.I.R. lodged by the petitioner bearing Case Crime No. 0485 of 2024 u/s 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 506 IPC, P.S. Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. This Court vide order dated 05.12.2024 directed the parties to appear before the Mediation & Conciliation Center of this Court on 11.12.2024 for settlement of their dispute through mediation. 4. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the parties lastly appeared before the Mediation & Conciliation Center of this Court on 11.12.2024 and the Mediators have submitted its report dated 21.3.2025, which is on record in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 9239 of 2024. The report of the Mediators dated 21.3.2025 indicates that the mediation was successfully completed. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 5,6 & 7 has also submitted that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled through mediation. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the issue in question, particularly, the fact that the present petitioner (complainant) and the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aseem Goswami, Azhar Ikram Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ram Milan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) opposite parties no. 5,6 and 7 (accused persons) have settled the dispute through mediation, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the mediation report dated 21.3.2025. The mediation report submitted by the Mediators would be the part of this order. 7. No order as to costs. September 15, 2025 Om CRLP No. 9191 of 2024 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench