Shiv Nandan v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ORS.
/10327/2024 · 2025-01-08
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169336 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 169336 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1211-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10327 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shiv Nandan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhanu Singh,Rajesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Verma Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri A.K. Verma learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of the U.P. Pollution Control Board.
2. Sri A.K. Verma, learned counsel for the U.P. Pollution Control Board on the basis of instructions has submitted that against two rice mills which were established by the opposite party nos. 7 and 8, necessary proceedings were initiated by the U.P. Pollution Control Board on a complaint being received.
3. The rice mill run by the opposite party no. 7 has already been closed, whereas, a notice has been issued to opposite party no. 8.
4. That being so, we do not see any reason as to why the U.P. Pollution Control Board may not take action as is warranted against the rice mills operating without adherence to the environmental laws.
5. The writ petion in view of the action being in progress does not call for further directions. We hope and trust that the necessary action will be proceeded with by the U.P. Pollution Control Board expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. The writ petion is accordingly disposed of. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 8.1.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench