SANNAPAREDDY LEELA MOHAN REDDY v. K. SURESH KUMAR, IAS
CC/3073/2025 · 2026-04-23
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1693 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1693 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010546762025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3073/2025 Between:
1. SANNAPAREDDY LEELA MOHAN REDDY, S/O SANNAPAREDDY VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O 26/3/2132,12TH STREET,
CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, MVS KALAYANA MANDAPAM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. K SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. P SAM PATH KUMAR IAS, DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MANGALAGIRI ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. HIMANSHU SHUKLA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
5. Y O NANDHAN, NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
6. ALAHARI SESHAGIRI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NELLORE.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
2
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the Respondents upon due enquiry may be pleased to punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for their willful disobedience of order dated 14.07.2025 passed in Writ Petition No 17628 of 2025 on the file of this Honble court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.17628 of 2025, dated 14.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
24.04.2026 PNS